Rhizaria
The clade Rhizaria of unicellular eukaryotes was named very recently (Cavalier-Smith,
2002), but has rapidly ingratiated itself as an industry
standard. It contains a large number of mostly amoeboid organisms,
including such significant groups as the radiolarians and
foraminiferans.
So far, Rhizaria seems to be supported solely by molecular data – there are
no morphological characters unique to the clade. Most are biciliate
amoeboflagellates, at least at some point in the life cycle – though many have
dispensed with flagella altogether.
Pseudopodia are root-like
reticulopodia, filopodia and/or
axopodia – not broad
lobopodia as in Amoeba.
All of these features can, however, be found in members of other clades.
Nevertheless, the Rhizaria are supported by both rRNA and
actin trees
(Cavalier-Smith & Chao,
2003; Nikolaev et
al. 2004), and are
probably here to stay.
Image: unidentified radiolarian from the Hamilton
College Electron Microscopy site.
© Christopher Taylor 2004. CT041217
Rhizaria
|-—Radiolaria
| |--Polycystinea
| `--+--Sticholonche
| `--Acantharea
`--+--+--Gromiidae
| `--+--Ascetosporea
| `--Foraminifera
`--+--Phytomyxea
`--+--Desmothoracida
`--‘core Cercozoa’ (including Phaeodarea)
|
SSU
rRNA and actin
trees both give a similar picture of rhizarian phylogeny – the phylogeny below
is derived from Nikolaev
et al. (2004) and Polet
et al. (2004). The positions of Sticholonche and Ascetosporea,
however, should be treated with some suspicion.
Cavalier-Smith (2002; Cavalier-Smith & Chao,
2003)
previously suggested a monophyletic clade, Retaria, formed by Radiolaria and
Foraminifera, characterised by reticulose pseudopods in both groups, and
supported weakly by molecular phylogenies. More recent analyses fail to support
this grouping, and reticulopodia probably evolved independently in the two
groups – an adaptation to large size in both? Instead, Foraminifera group with
Gromia, a marine amoeboid with smooth filopodia that produces an organic
test like many basal Foraminifera (Longet et al. 2003).
© Christopher Taylor 2004. CT041217
The Rhizaria can be thought of as being composed of Radiolaria,
Foraminifera,
and Cercozoa. That's fortunate, since we are going to treat Rhizaria in
that very manner.
Large, planktonic forms that
produce a glassy, intricate shell. A protein capsule divides the
cytoplasm into inner and outer compartments. The capsule is
perforated by numerous scattered pores through which the
axopodia pass. All radiolarians secrete strontium sulphate at
some point in the life cycle – as the adult shell in
Acantharea, and as crystals in ‘swarmer cells’ produced
during asexual reproduction in Polycystinea. The adult shell in
Polycystinea is siliceous. Axopodia joined by cross-branches.
Endosymbiotic algae are usually present (Polet
et al. 2004).
The name ‘Radiolaria’ has a particularly ghastly history
– traditionally, it has included three glassy-shelled taxa,
the Polycystinea, Acantharea and Phaeodarea. The monophyly of
these three groups has long been suspect, and Radiolaria has
been used for Polycystinea and Acantharea excluding Phaeodarea,
Polycystinea and Phaeodarea excluding Acantharea, and
Polycystinea alone. Phaeodarea are not closely related to the
other two taxa (see below), but Acantharea and Polycystinea form
a monophyletic group (Nikolaev
et al., 2004; Polet et al., 2004). In the absence of a better name, we
elected have to
keep using Radiolaria for a mere segment of its previous self.
It may be arbitrarily defined as organisms closer to
Thalassicola (Polycystinea) than to Allogromia (Foraminifera) or
Cercomonas (Cercozoa).
Radiolaria have also been included in the
past as part of a taxon Actinopoda along with a number of radial
axopod-bearing organisms called Heliozoa. ‘Heliozoa’ has
since turned out to be a rampantly polyphyletic group –
examples have been reclassified as chromists and opisthokonts (Mikrjukov,
2000; Cavalier-Smith & Chao,
2003; Nikolaev et al., 2004). One past heliozoan, Sticholonche, was
found by Nikolaev et al. (2004) to cluster with
Acantharea, but support values were low, and this seems
suspicious. Its inclusion in this position would, for instance,
imply that the intracellular capsule either evolved
independently in the Acantharea and Polycystinea, or that it was
lost in the ancestor of Sticholonche. Sticholonche is most
notable for the way that the axopods are actually used to
actively row the organism through the water (Febvre-Chevalier,
1990).
Polycystinea have an extensive fossil record back to the
late Precambrian (Cachon
et al. 1990), and are
very important in biostratigraphy.
© Christopher Taylor 2004. CT041218
|
|
| Radiolarians
|
|
The
Polycystinea (sometimes spelled Polycistinea or Polycystina) are
one group of the Radiolaria. These are not just
"small shelly fauna," they are tiny shelly fauna made up
of single, if rather complex, cells. The shell turns out to be made of
amorphous silica -- essentially sand -- without the admixture of organics that
characterize similar forms. Polycystinea are exclusively marine but
found in great numbers in the oceans. Their fossil record goes back almost
a billion years, well into Precambrian time.
Like other radiolarians, the cytoplasm of Polycystinea is
divided into ectoplasm and
endoplasm by a perforated protein capsule -- not the
nuclear membrane, but a novel structure unique to this group. The
endoplasm forms a central medulla enclosed by this porous, membranous
capsule. The nucleus is inside this central region. The ectoplasm is outside the
capsule and forms the region known as the cortex (or calymma). The
visible remains shown in the image are made up of perforated tests (the
"shells"). In life, these are located in the ectoplasm.
Polycystinates extend pseudopods supported by a complex microtubular array (axopods)
which originate in the endoplasm. The pseudopods pass through pores in the
test and extend, covered with a thin layer of cytoplasm, from the surface of the
cell. Spines of the test, if any, also pass through the capsule and extend,
covered with cytoplasm, from the surface of the cell. The ectoplasm is often
vacuolated and frequently contains photosynthetic zooxanthellae.
The endoplasm actually contains all of the organelles
normally associated with a "normal" heterotrophic eukaryotic cell,
including mitochondria, a nucleus, and a cytoskeleton. The ectoplasm is
largely filled with digestive vacuoles, symbiotic algae, and the test.
From an evolutionary standpoint, the Polycystina appear to be one step towards a
whole different type of biological organization based on a 3-compartment cell,
rather than the 2-compartment cell of metazoans. In fact, a number of
polycystinean species are colonial. It is interesting to speculate on what
might have evolved on this model, had circumstances been different.
ATW030819. Text public domain. No rights
reserved.
|
|
The Acantharea already
have their own
page. |
|
The Foraminiferan clades are highly contentious, which is too bad. The
evolution and diversity of these sturdy, testate Eukarya form an important part
of Mesozoic history and stratigraphy. A better understanding of their
?Cambrian beginnings might give us a bater handle on their later
development. We treat only one group of stem Foraminifera here, the
Acetosporea.
 Amoeboid,
non-flagellate parasites of shellfish, comprising the orders
Haplosporida and Paramyxida. Cavalier-Smith
& Chao (2003) found weak support for an association with
the plant-parasitic Phytomyxea and included both in a subphylum
Endomyxa. Nikolaev
et al. (2004) found Haplosporida as the closest
relatives to Foraminifera. Historically, they have been regarded
as similar to Microsporidia.
Watch this space. Haplosporidium,
Urosporidium, Marteilia. Image: Haplosporidia
from the Leech
Lab site of Dr. Mark Siddall at the AMNH. |
|
Amoeboid organisms
characterised by reticulate, granular pseudopodia (hence the
often-seen alternative name Granuloreticulosa). Mostly marine;
endosymbiotic algae often present. The majority of Foraminifera
produce a test of some form or other – mostly calcareous, but
agglutinated or organic in more basal forms. One group of basal
agglutinated-test Foraminifera became sessile, and a subgroup of
this line took to growing to Brobdignagian proportions – the
Xenophyophorea. Pawlowski
et al. (2003).
Foraminifera, especially the calcareous forms, have a fossil
record stretching back to the Cambrian (Lee,
1990), and are
especially important biostratigraphically.
The Xenophyophorea
are either Foraminifera, or possibly the sister group of
Foraminifera. These bizarre, gigantic protists are
commonly several centimeters in diameter and are discussed on
their own page.
Text © Christopher Taylor 2004. CT041218 |
|
Finally, the Cercozoan group:
Plasmodial plant parasites,
primarily known for the problematic Plasmodiophora, the
cause of club root in brassicas. Appear to be the most basal
branch of Cercozoa. Generally regarded in the past as fungi of
some sort, and so referred to as Plasmodiophoromycota or some
variation thereof. Phytomyxea at least has the virtue of being a
much shorter name.
Text © Christopher Taylor 2004. CT041218
|
|
Cercozoa, originally named by
Cavalier-Smith in 1998, is a diverse group of taxa united solely
on molecular grounds, but supported by a number of genes (Longet
et al., 2003). As generally circumscribed,
Cercozoa also includes Gromiidae and Phytomyxea, but these more
divergent taxa have been listed separately here to show their
relative phylogenetic positions (and also to avoid having to
lump Foraminifera in with the Cercozoa). For a brief period
before 1998, the clade soon to be called Cercozoa was referred
to as Rhizopoda, as it included a large proportion of the
species previously included in that form-taxon (specifically
those bearing filose pseudopodia). But as many rhizopods were
not in this group, including the best-known example, Amoeba, and
many Cercozoa are flagellates rather than amoeboid, the name
Cercozoa is much more welcome.
Amongst notable members of the
Cercozoa are amoeboid forms such as Difflugia, which produce
agglutinated tests that may be fossilised (the record extends
back to the
Neoproterozoic
– Finlay et al.,
2004), and the Chlorarachnea (e.g. Chlorarachnion), marine
amoeboid organisms which possess chloroplasts derived from a
secondary endosymbiosis with a green alga. Cavalier-Smith,
(2003). The nucleus of the endosymbiont in Chlorarachnion, in
fact, has not fully degraded as in most secondarily plastid-bearing
eukaryotes, and the chloroplast retains a small nucleomorph
contained within the surrounding membranes. Nikolaev et
al. (2004) and Polet et al. (2004) both found Phaeodarea
to also be nested within Cercozoa, though a strong association
with any particular taxon or taxa was not supported. Phaeodarea
were traditionally included in Radiolaria, and share with
Acantharea and Polycystinea the traits of a glassy shell (formed
of a combination of silica and organic material in Phaeodarea)
and a capsule dividing the cytoplasm into inner and outer
compartments. In the Radiolaria as here defined, however, the
capsule is thin and perforated by numerous pores – in
Phaeodarea, the capsule is much thicker, and usually only three
pores pass through it, the astropylum and and usually two
parapyla situated at the opposite pole. The astropylum forms a
cone-like cytopharynx that is used for the ingestion of food
items. Phaeodarea also bear a phaeodium, consisting of balls of
darkly pigmented waste matter, usually near the astropylum.
Phaeodarea also lack algal endosymbionts and cross-branches
between the axopods. Polet et al. (2004). Image:
Difflugia from the Droplet
site. Text © Christopher Taylor 2004. CT041218 |
|
checked ATW061220