| Mollusca | ![]() |
Cephalopoda |
| CYRTOSOMA | Ellesmerocerida |
| Page Back | Unit Back | Metazoa | References | Cladogram | Pieces | Taxon Index |
| Page Next | Unit Next | Unit Home | References | Cladogram | Glossary | Time |
CEPHALOPODA |--PLECTRONOCERIDA `--+--ELLESMEROCERIDA |--ENDOCERIDA |--ACTINOCERIDA |--PSEUDORTHOCERIDA |--DISCOSORIDA `--+--Nautiloidea `--Neocephalopoda |
Introduction
|
Evolving in the latest Cambrian from the Plectronocerida, these were the stem lineage from which all other cephalopods evolved. They are characterized by mostly small (later medium-sized) forms with a straight or curved conch, crowded septa, and marginal siphuncle. Most Tremadoc (earliest Ordovician) cephalopods belong to this group
Shells primitively small, closely septate, siphuncle marginal, relatively large, tubular or concave segments, with extremely short septal necks and connecting rings, when present, relatively thick and often complex in structure. Shells primitively compressed in section, straight or curved, with the siphuncle on the concave side...Other families may depart from the primitive pattern of compressed section and marginal siphuncle, but show their affinities by the thickened connecting ring, vestigial necks, or both.Flower & Kummel (1950)
Ellesmeroceratids are found in shallow water associations, usually in association with algal reefs. They were most likely bottom dwellers, although many were probably capable of swimming. As with the Cambrian cephalopods they possessed very closely spaced septa. Allowing for the cameral mantle, it is unlikely that the effect of the gas in the camerae would have been sufficient to reduce or balance the weight of the shell. Flower (1955).
Infraclass unnamed ("Ellesmeroceroidea"? or several infraclasses?)
Order Plectronocerida Flower, 1964
Order Yanhecerida Chen & Qi, 1979 (or included in Plectronocerida or Ellesmerocerida?)
Order Protactinocerida Chen & Qi, 1979 (or included in Plectronocerida or Ellesmerocerida?)
Order Ellesmerocerida Flower, 1950
Order Endocerida
Teichert, 1933
Order Injetocerida Balashov, 1960 (or included in Endocerida?)
Order Discosorida Flower, 1950
Order Actinocerida
Teichert, 1933
Order Pseudorthocerida
The following list is in no way definitive, up to date, or comprehensive. It is mostly from on Flower & Kummel (1950). The dates are from The Fossil Record II
Family ELLESMEROCERATIDAE Kobayasi
![]() |
|
Fengshan Formation (Latest Dolgellian) of north-east China. Length of above specimen: 7 cm from Teichert 1988 from Chen and Teichert 1983a |
Tremadoc of Laurentia Length: 3.5 cm image from Teichert 1988, pp. 28, from Teichert 1967] |
Family ACAROCERATIDAE
A small family of small, gently curved, laterally compressed shells, with close-spaced septa, and marginal cylindrical siphuncle. They differ little from the earliest Ellesmeroceratidae and the Plectronoceratidae, both of which are contemporary. Two genera are known from the Fengshan Formation of north-east China.
Furongian (Middle Late to Latest Dolgellian)
Acaroceras, Weishanhuceras
Family HUAIHECERATIDAE
Elongate exogastrically curved (the opposite of most nautiloids), laterally compressed shells, very
similar to Ellesmeroceratidae. Three genera are known from the Fengshan Formation of north-east China.
Furongian (Late to Latest Dolgellian)
Huaiheceras
Family CYCLOSTOMICERATIDAE Ulrich, Foerste, Miller and Furnish
Thin-walled marginal siphuncles as in the Ellesmeroceratidae, the shell becoming broader in cross section, shells endogastric to straight or exogastric and breviconic
Early to Middle Ordovician (?Floian to
Darriwilian)
Cyclostomiceras, Woosteroracs, Stytocyrtoceras.
Family PROTOCYCLOCERATIDAE Kobayashi
Family BALTOCERATIDAE Kobayashi
Long straight slender smooth orthocones, similar internally to the Ellesmeroceratidae, developing broader cross section and a thin marginal siphuncle which may be somewhat separated from the ventral wall. Siphuncle free from deposits, necks vestigial, ring primitively thick, secondarily thin and homogeneous.
Flower
(1955), Dzik (1984), and Teichert
(1988) all agree that the Baltoceratidae were the likely ancestors of the Orthocerida. These nautiloids thus can be considered a paraphyletic grade that is the starting point for the clade
Neocephalopoda. The
Darriwilian Eobactrites is sometimes considered the earliest member of the family Bactridae, but it is more likely that true bactrids evolved much alter.
Ordovician (Tremadoc - represented by the very tiny form Microbaltoceras but became more diverse in the
Floian - Teichert 1988, and ranging through to
Sandbian).
Pachendoceras, Baltoceras, Wolungoceras, Oxfordoceras, Ogygoceras, Murrayoceras, Eobactrites.
Family BASSLEROCERATIDAE Ulrich, Foerste, Miller and Unklesbay
This is a small group of specialized ellesmerocerids with a concave outline of siphuncle segments. They appeared in the latest Tremadoc of China. Middle and Late Ordovician forms developed unusual modifications of the connecting ring. Presumably developed from the Ellesmeroceratidae. Flower (1955) considered the Bathmoceratidae and Eothinoceratidae ancestral to the Actinoceratida, but later (Flower, 1988) rejected this hypothesis. Yet perhaps it is not impossible that the early actinocerids may still have derived from a generalized early Cyrtocertinine lineage.
Family BATHMOCERATIDAE Holm.
Shell straight (although one curved form is known), depressed, siphuncle large, necks relatively long, connecting ring produced into long lobes that intrude into the siphuncle; also consistently thickened in the segments near the living chamber,
into which they intrude. Dzik
(1984). Flower
& Kummel (1950) considered the Bathmoceratidae ancestral to Polydesmiidae of the Actinoceratida, but later
(Flower 1988) saw them simply as an early Cyrtocertinine lineage. In a diagram in
Flower (1988), the Bathmoceratidae and the Eothinoceratidae are both derived from an unspecified early Cyrtocertinine lineage.
Early to Middle Ordovician (?Floian to
Darriwilian).
Bathmoceras.
Family EOTHINOCERATIDAE
Shell straight or gently curved. Greatly thickened connecting rings that are triangular in cross-section. In this regard intermediate between typical and more advanced species of the genus Bathmoceras.
Dzik (1984). Resemble, and presumably ancestral to, the Cyrtocerinidae.
Flower & Kummel
(1950); Flower (1988:
fig. 1).
Early Ordovician (?Floian).
Eothinoceras.
Family CYRTOCERINIDAE Flower.
Short endogastric compressed shells, siphuncle submarginal, necks vestigial, connecting ring greatly thickened, projecting into cavity of siphuncle. These were the last
ellesmocerids, surviving after other members of the order had become extinct.
Teichert (1988).
Late Ordovician (Sandbian to Hirnantian)
Cyrtocertina.
| Page Back | Page Top | Unit Home | Page Next |