Palæos:		Bones: Dermal Bones
The Vertebrates		Mandibular Series:  Gulars

The Mandibular Series: Gulars

The gulars are restricted to various fish groups and are not terribly interesting bones in themselves. They would not normally be worth much attention. However, they do provide an occasion to add a rarely noticed footnote to the jaw story which, as frequently remarked elsewhere, is the central plot in our tale of the vertebrate skull.  

The gular is defined in Fishbase as a "median, dermal bone between the dentary bones of some primitive fishes (e.g. Latimeria and Elops)." As has been our general rule with bones with this kind of phylogenetic distribution, we will define the Standard Condition with reference to Cheirolepis. For once, there seems not to be any reason to suspect that the actinopterygian and sarcopterygian versions of this bone are independently derived.

From the figure, it is almost painfully obvious that the gulars are serially homologous with the branchiostegal rays -- the series of dermal bones that provide the flexible bone floor to the mouth in many different fish lineages. What is less often remarked is that the same relationship holds for the opercular series. The acanthodian Mesacanthus (see figure) shows this relationship well. This complete continuity between the opercular and branchiostegal series is also present in Mimia; and even the highly derived dipnoan, Griphognathus, suggests the same relationship. We can even follow the trail of supposition a little further out and remark on the similarity to the infradentary series, just lateral to the branchiostegal series, which was discussed in connection with the derivation of the surangular, and perhaps even the splenials on the inside of the jaw.

What this all suggests is that there may be a common derivation for structures as diverse as the opercular, the surangular and the gular. All of these seem to have evolved from serial repetition of a simple laminar pattern of small dermal plates running along the outside of the "mandibular arch."

ATW011207.

Note added in disproof: Long (2001) remarks that Onychodus is primitive because, among other things, it has (placoderm-like?) submandibular plates rather than branchiostegal rays, although it does possess gulars of a sort. As excellent as the figures are, it is not particularly easy to tell exactly how the ventral jaw is organized from his brief article. However, it is plain that the branchiostegal rays are not primitive for Sarcopterygii. Thus, the homology with the actinopterygian arrangement is in doubt after all. ATW011228

checked ATW050520